A Timeline of the Decade 1910-1919

Gender Empowerment Measure Free Essays

Gender Empowerment Measure or GEM is a system used in measuring the gender inequality of a nation when it comes to both the political and economic opportunities. Using data from different nations, GEM is able to ranked nations on how the gender inequality issue is improving over time. We will write a custom essay sample on Gender Empowerment Measure or any similar topic only for you Order Now The system used a more complex formula when it comes to measuring the political and economic participation of women relative to that of men. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) used four indicators in order to create a composite GEM. These indicators are seats held by women in parliament, female professional and technical workers, female administrators and managers, and the real GDP per capita of women. A GEM table is an indicator of gender inequality between different nations. It captures three major areas of gender inequality among nations. The first area is the extent to which women participate in decision-making in terms of political aspect. The second is the economic participation of women as well as their decision-making power. The third area is the measure of the power that women exert over the nations economic resources. In the 2009 Human Development report, Sweden was ranked first in GEM with 47% sets in parliament held by women, 32% female legislators, senior officials and managers, 51% female professional and technical worker and 0. 67 ratio of estimated female to male earned income. The figures show that Swedish women enjoy the most gender equality than any other nation included in the report. GEM is also a measure of how the inequality between men and women are changing through time. Thus, having a greater GEM means that a country is likely to develop a sense of equality between the role of men and women in society. Reference Human Development Report (2009). Gender Empowerment Measure and its Components. How to cite Gender Empowerment Measure, Papers

”The Forgotten 500” by Gregory Freeman Essay Sample free essay sample

The Forgotten 500 by Gregory Freeman is an untold narrative of a deliverance undertaken by a group of work forces ( the OSS- finally the CIA ) . utilizing aircraft to deliver five hundred and twelve downed aviators from the mountains in Nazi occupied Yugoslavia. The aviators had to avoid gaining control while expecting a deliverance. some for months others for a twelvemonth or more. With the assistance of the Serbian people and General Mihailovich. who loved Americans and resisted Nazi business. built by manus a landing strip without alarming the Germans or jeopardizing local Serbs. to convey in multiple C47 aircraft in the largest deliverance behind enemy lines in World War II and since. Operation Halyard. General Mihailovich who one time had entire support by Allies until Tito’s agents infiltrated British central offices and presented false paperss which showed Mihailovich and his work forces join forcesing with Nazi business forces. Ultimately. Allied forces turned their support to communist leader Tito. We will write a custom essay sample on †The Forgotten 500† by Gregory Freeman Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Operation Halyard was non mentioned for over 40 old ages. Mihailovich and his attempts were erased from history along with the 500 downed American aviators. After British and US treachery. Mihailovich was captured by the Partisans. given a rigged test and executed after the war. Many of the rescued aviators and their protagonists held mass meetings on Mihailovich’s behalf pleading for clemency with no help. Mihaiovich’s girl was finally presented the Legion of Merit by President Harry Truman in award of her male parent who rescued. protected and returned to safety so many of our downed aviators.

3 Cases of Mixed Metaphors

3 Cases of Mixed Metaphors 3 Cases of Mixed Metaphors 3 Cases of Mixed Metaphors By Mark Nichol Efforts to describe something idiomatically with the use of metaphor- a word or phrase that figuratively provides an analogy- more than once in a sentence will likely distractingly interfere with reading comprehension, so avoid using more than one metaphor in a sentence, or at least ensure that they are complementary. Discussions after each example in this post explain the difficulty of using two metaphors, and revisions suggest a solution. 1. What you hear symbolizes something ominous- impending danger lurking just beneath the surface, which has been hanging over our heads in recent years. The metaphors in this sentence come at the reader from both directions, with an allusion to subterranean peril and an indirect reference to the anecdote of the sword of Damocles, in which a king suspends a sword over a courtier’s head by a single hair to teach the man a lesson about the peril of being in a position of power. To avoid this discordance, the metaphors should be consistent in imagery: â€Å"What you hear symbolizes something ominous- impending danger lurking just beneath the surface, which has percolating in recent years.† (Percolating is also a metaphor, but such one-word analogies embedded in our language do not distract as easily as more vivid imagery, and the verb is concordant with the preceding metaphor.) 2. These actions resulted in a significant redirection of market focus and gave the firms a ringside seat when the proverbial music stopped. â€Å"A ringside seat† refers to achieving a privileged position (literally, a front-row seat at a boxing match), and the phrase about music alludes to surviving a round of the game of musical chairs, in which competitors circle a group of chairs that numbers one less than the number of participants and vie to obtain a seat when music that is briefly played suddenly ceases, causing one person to be disqualified in each round. Although both metaphors deal, in a sense, with attainment of privilege, the contexts are different, and one is best abandoned in favor of the other: â€Å"These actions resulted in a significant redirection of market focus and gave the firms a ringside seat when that shift occurred.† 3. The same division within the party that derailed healthcare reform could also rear its head with respect to tax reform.   The reference to figurative derailment is at odds with the clichà ©d metaphor of a threatening creature preparing to strike. Again, sacrifice one metaphor for another (preferably, replacing the clichà © with a straightforward verb): â€Å"The same division within the party that derailed healthcare reform could also occur with respect to tax reform.† (An attempt to match the derailment reference with another train-related metaphor will only call attention to the symmetry at the expense of the point of the sentence.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the General category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:4 Types of Gerunds and Gerund Phrases75 Idioms and Expressions That Include â€Å"Break†What is an Anagram?

Drug Courts and Their Efficiency

Drug Courts and Their Efficiency Introduction The growing rates of incarceration among people, who take drugs, prompted legislators to adopt different strategies in order to address this issue. Drug courts are believed to be one of the solutions to this problem. This paper is aimed at examining the functioning of these institutions and their efficiency.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Drug Courts and Their Efficiency specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More These are the main questions that should be examined. Overall, it is possible to say that these organizations can reduce the level of recidivism among drug offenders and help them reintegrate into the society. To a great extent, these institutions can help people cope with their addition. However, they can be effective only in those cases when if there are well-developed rehabilitation programs that support people who are in the urgent need of help; otherwise this policy may not attend the res ults expected by the community. Moreover, much attention should be paid to the use of resources. Policy-makers should remember about opportunity costs associated with drug courts. Still despite these limitations, one can say that these organizations can help community develop better tools of crime prevention. This is the main thesis that should be analyzed more closely. The main rationale for the establishment of drug courts There are several reasons why that made policy-makers to consider some alternatives to existing methods of crime prevention. In particular, one can speak about the increasing rates of recidivism among people who had been previously convicted of drug offences (Longshore, Turner, Wenzel, Morral, 2001, p. 7). Additionally, substance abusers are overrepresented in the criminal justice system (Boyum Kleiman, 2002). As a rule, their dependence on substances is the underlying factor that increases the likelihood of their deviance (Boyum Kleiman, 2002). In many cases , these individuals are not able to reintegrate themselves in the society because very often they remain addicted to substances (Bennett 2005). Moreover, in many cases, these people can commit even more serious felonies provided that their addiction is not treated effectively (Franco 2011). Very often legislators advocate the use of minimum sentences on criminals; however, this policy is not sufficient for reducing the rates of recidivism (Waller, 2008). Thus, one can speak about the existence of a vicious cycle that should be broken in some way. This is one of the details that researchers focus on (Boyum Kleiman, 2002). Thus, the absence of an effective policy is the main factor that led to the establishment of drug courts. These institutions were supposed to be response to this problem. It should be noted that drug courts examine only non-violent offences such as possession of cannabis, the purchase of drugs with the help of forged prescriptions, or small-scale dealing.Advertisin g Looking for critical writing on constitutional law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The offenders are obliged to undergo such procedures as in-patient detoxification and rehabilitation (Franco 2011, p. 20). Drug courts do not interact with individuals that can pose a threat to the life or health of other people. In most cases, there is no need to incarcerate these people. This is one of the issues that can be distinguished. The efficiency of these institutions There are various studies are aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of drug courts. In order to cope with this task, researchers compare the experiences of people who participated in drug court programs and those offenders who did not (Fulkerson, 2012). They pay attention to various indicators such the rates of recidivism or people’s ability to cope with drug addiction (Fulkerson, 2012). This is the main peculiarity of their research methodology. These academic sources can be divided into several groups. First, one can mention that many authors emphasize the reduced rates of recidivism. For example, according Cassia Spohn et al. (2001), people, who participated in drug courts programs, were less likely to be arrested for misdemeanor (p. 160). For instance, 42.1 of these people part were re-arrested; yet, this rate was 60.8 % for people who were tried in conventional courts (Spohn et al., 2001, p. 160). Moreover, these organizations can benefit juvenile offenders who are dependent on substances (Torgensen, Buttars, Norman, Bailey 2004). Additionally, the participation in drug courts reducing the risk of family conflicts (Green Rempel, 2012, p. 169). Finally, such rehabilitation programs can people who may have various forms of addiction. This is one of the improvements that these organizations can bring. However, much attention should be paid to characteristics of people who took part in this program. Much attention should be pa id such characteristics as the support of close relatives, peer pressure, employment opportunities, and many other forces that can influence a person’s behavior. This question is not closely examined in this research articles. This is one of the limitations that should not be overlooked by policy-makers who should evaluate the performance of drug courts programs. They should pay more attention to the factors that increase the efficiency of drug courts because in this way, they can make this policy more productive. This step is important for helping people reintegrate into the community. Other researcher point out that the efficiency of drug courts programs depends on such criteria, as marital status, education, or employment opportunities.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Drug Courts and Their Efficiency specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More For example, Allison Mateyoke-Scrivner et al (2004) point out t hat older offenders are more likely to complete a rehabilitation program (p. 617). Additionally, researchers note that people with the history of intravenous drug use are less likely to rehabilitate (Roll, Prendergast, Richardson, Burdon, Ramirez, 2005, p. 641). This form of addiction is usually more difficult to overcome (Roll et al., 2005). Moreover, researchers point out the offenders, who have already undergone drug treatment, are less likely to benefit from rehabilitation programs (Miller Shutt, 2001, p. 91). Such individuals have already made an attempt to struggle with their dependence but some of them have lost confidence in their ability to overcome their addiction. Certainly, these studies indicate at the efficiency of drug courts. However, they also show that some participants can derive more benefits from the treatment that drug courts offer (Roll et al., 2005). This is one of the main aspects that should be considered by legislators, policy-makers as well medical work ers who develop rehabilitation programs. They should also bear in mind that some drug offenders will find it more difficult to reintegrate into the community. Legal professionals can anticipate the difficulties that they can encounter in the future. Overall, scholars, who examine this question, acknowledge that their studies cannot capture the complexity of social or economic factors that can shape the choices that drug offenders can take. As it has been said before, one can speak about employment opportunities or the support of relatives. Additionally, one should pay attention to the competence of people who should provide psychological assistance to drug offenders. These professionals should be able to find an approach to various individuals who may represent different educational backgrounds, races, ethnicities, cultures and so forth (Fulkerson, 2012). Therefore, one cannot argue the behavior of separate offenders can be attributed only to the role of drug courts. More attention should be paid to the competence of separate professionals, rather than organizations. This is one of the limitations that should be taken into account. Nevertheless, one can say that such forces always play an important role, but their presence does not mean that drug courts are not necessary. These organizations create a framework through which offenders can get access to efficient treatment. This is one of the arguments that can be put forward in support of this policy. Yet, there are researchers, who are highly skeptical about the efficiency of drug courts. One of their arguments is that there are many hidden costs of drug costs. In particular, the money which has been invested in these institutions might have been directed to other areas such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure (Carey Finigan 2004).Advertising Looking for critical writing on constitutional law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More They are important for creating opportunities to community members and researchers are aware of these concerns (Carey Finigan 2004). Thus, one can argue that policy-makers should consider the interest of other stakeholders. This is one of the objections that can be raised. Nevertheless, it is important to remember that the effects of drug-related crimes can be much more expensive because people, who cannot cope with their addiction to drugs, can pose a great threat to the lives, health, and property of many people (Carey Finigan 2004). By overlooking this problem, the society can be exposed to various risks (Carey Finigan 2004). This is one of the details that should not be overlooked by legislators. Therefore, the criticism of drug courts may not always be justified. Secondly, the critics of drugs courts say that the alleged successes of drug courts are often based on cherry picking. In other words, these institutions select only those offenders who are more likely to complete a rehabilitation program (Barnes, Miller, Miller, Gibson, 2008, p. 166). As a rule, these organizations lay stress on screening interviews which can determine whether an individual can benefit from the rehabilitation program (Barnes et al., 2008, p. 166). For instance, people, who have prior convictions, are less likely to qualify for drug courts programs (Duke, 2012; Shaffer 2011). Moreover, there are different forms of addition. Some of them are very difficult to treat. The main problem is that drug courts do not accept people with this form of dependence. Therefore, one can argue that such organizations may not work with people who urgently need their assistance. The adoption of this strategy is important for explaining the effectiveness of drug courts. However, this policy may not necessarily result in the reduction of recidivism among drug offenders. These examples are also vital for objective evaluation of drug programs. Therefore, while evaluating various studies related to d rug courts, researchers should closely examine the way in which these organizations select the participants for their programs. This examination is important for the validity of the research methodology. However, one can provide several objections to the criticisms of drug courts. First of all, one can say that screening interviews are necessary because one has to identify possible mental disorders and cognitive deficiencies. This information is necessary for determining whether a person can pose a danger to the lives of others (Miller Shutt, 2001). Therefore, legislators should make sure that the participants are able to benefit from these programs. Thus, one cannot say that screening interviews are not necessary because they are important for eliminating many risks. Secondly, the instances of cherry picking can be eliminated by introducing clear eligibility standards. The selection should not be based on the subjective opinion. These are the main details that should be considered by policy-makers who need to evaluate the positive and negative aspects of adopting this policy. These are one of the main points that can be made. Conclusion These examples suggest that the efficiency of drug courts is a subject of many studies. Numerous studies have confirmed that these institutions can benefit many people. In particular, they are able to overcome their dependence on drugs and avoid the risks of recidivism. However, it is important to examine possible criticisms that are related to such a practice as cherry picking because it can undermine the very goal of the organizations. These organizations should develop policies ensuring that people are not denied the access to rehabilitation programs because drug courts want to improve their performance indicators. Furthermore, it is vital to make sure that the resources allocated to these institutions are effectively used. Provided that these issues are addressed properly, drug courts can become an effective solution to c rime. These are the main details that should be considered. Reference List Barnes, J. C., Miller, J. M., Miller, H. V., Gibson, C. (2008). Juvenile drug court program admission, demeanor and cherry-picking: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 166-176. Bennett, T. (2005). The Association Between Multiple Drug Misuse and Crime.  International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(1), 63-81. Boyum, D., Kleiman, M. (2002) Substance abuse policy from a crime-control perspective. In J. Wilson J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (2nd. Ed.) (pp. 95-1 11). San Franciscom, NC: ICS Press. Carey, S. Finigan, M. (2004). A Detailed Cost Analysis in a Mature Drug Court Setting A Cost-Benefit Evaluation of the Multnomah County Drug Court. Journal of Contemporary Criminal, 20(3), 315-338. Duke, K. (2012). From Crime to Recovery The Reframing of British Drugs Policy?  Journal of Drug Issues, 43(1), 39-55. Franco, C. (2011). Drug courts: Background, Effe ctiveness and Policy Issues for Congress. Journal Of Current Issues In Crime, Law Law Enforcement, 4(1), 19-50. Fulkerson, A. (2012). Understanding Success and Nonsuccess in the Drug Court, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,  57(10), 1297-1316. Green, M., Rempel, M. (2012). Beyond crime and drug use: Do adult drug courts produce other psychosocial benefits? Journal of Drug Issues, 42(2), 156-177. Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 7-25. Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., Webster, J., Staton, M., Leukefeld, C. (2004). Treatment Retention Predictors of Drug Court Participants in a Rural State. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30(3), 605-625. Miller, J., Shutt, J. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 91-106. Roll, J., Prendergast, M., Richardson, K., Burdon, W., Ramirez, A. (2005). Identifying Predictors of Treatment Outcome in a Drug Court Program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30(3), 605-625. Shaffer, D. (2011). Outcomes Among Drug Court Participants: Does Drug of Choice Matter? Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 259-291. Spohn, C., Piper, R. K., Martin, T., Erika, D. F. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 149-176. Torgensen, K., Buttars, D. C., Norman, S. W., Bailey, S. (2004). How drug courts reduce substance abuse recidivism. The Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics, 32(4), 69-72. Waller, B. (2008). You decide!: current debates in criminal justice. New York, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Lesson plan on Identifying Synonyms Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Lesson plan on Identifying Synonyms - Coursework Example 2. Prompt students to think of other pairs of words that mean the same thing. Write these synonyms on sentence strips, and cut them apart so that you have one word for each student in the class. If students are having difficulty thinking of synonyms, give them one of these words and prompt them to think of a synonym: big/huge, tiny/small, scared/afraid, cute/pretty, rock/stone, loud/noisy, sofa/couch, dinner/supper, store/market, lady/woman, rug/carpet, yell/scream, finish/end, start/begin, quick/fast. 3. Shuffle the words. Explain to students that they will be going on a synonym hunt and that each of them will receive a card with a word on it that they must not look at until they are told. The object of the game is for each student to move around the room and find his/her partner, who has a word that means the same thing. When students find their partners, they should sit down. The game is over when each student has found a partner. To begin, fold each word in half so that the word cannot be seen and give one word to each student. When each student has a card say, â€Å"Let the hunt begin!† 5. As a fun follow-up activity or one to incorporate into the lesson, have students make their own puppets with various facial expressions. They can create puppet skits with partners or groups and think of synonyms. I decided to get someone from the crowd and get to know their feelings. From the line, I encountered Sofia Contreras, a housewife. She was very excited to be part of the event and was sure that the beauty store is a good initiative for the whole town. Prepare sentences with words underlined, and have students select a synonym from a word box for the underlined word in each sentence. For example, have students choose from among the words huge, fast, couch, small, and large to select synonyms for the

Antitrust Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Antitrust Case Study - Research Paper Example The agreement was signed on 17th February 1983 by the chairmen of Toyota and GM, and triggered one of the biggest and most controversial antitrust investigations in recent history. The vital question was whether it was plausible that the joint venture would actually lead to an increase in domestic small cars that were manufactured more efficiently, with good insights that GM and other firms could use in their plants, or whether it could lead to the regulation of pricing and other conduct between GM and Toyota and merely supplant less-anticompetitive options that GM could have employed in order to realize its objectives. The examination of these question shed light on a number of issues: the changes in behavior that could crop up from the joint venture, the scale of the efficiencies resulting from the venture, economic impacts of the joint venture, and the options available to GM. Some new tools were developed in order to evaluate and examine the joint venture, but they did not result in an agreement with regard to its consequences. Key words Antitrust, GM, Toyota, joint venture, small cars Analysis Most proposed joint ventures, acquisitions, and mergers above a particular size require that, under the stipulations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification act of 1976, the Department of Justice and the FTC (Federal transition Commission) be notified. This process provides both agencies with time to investigate a proposed arrangement before it is consummated. In this case, the FTC was mandated to carry out the investigation. In April 1983, Toyota and GM filed initial information and responded to calls for additional information during the summer (White, 1991). The investigation was referred to as one of the most intensive and extensive antitrust examinations ever conducted. The final judgment was delivered by five FTC commissioners, and was founded on different memoranda from a consulting economist, the Bureau of Competition (the legal personnel), and the Bu reau of Economics. The two bureaus recommended that the joint venture be approved, but the consultant’s report recommended that it should be contested. In December 1983, and based on these analyses, the FTC commissioners voted 3-2 provisionally to allow the joint venture to be effected, subject to a few minor revisions. Final approval was confirmed by the same margin (3-2) in April of 1984. The fact that there were no court proceedings means that Toyota and GM did not formally account for their positions. In addition to this, there was no direct merging of the issues between the critics and proponents of the joint venture, and not even a public disclosure of evidential paperwork (Cole & Andrea, 1987). The only thing that existed was a set of documents amounting to 1364 pages that the FTC released in January of 1984. Cooperative Behavior and Market Definition This is the first issue in the analysis of the joint venture, and involves the possibility of cooperative behavior in t he appropriate market. This called for a determination of the geographic market and appropriate product and then an evaluation of the likelihood that the companies in that market might cooperate in a way that would hurt market efficiency and consumers. Clearly, if the